Return to Top 
   Home      Names     Census Images     Charts     Documents     Immigration     Portraits     Maps / Places     Personal Gallery  
US map United States Federal Census Records   /   Images
    — with some State Censuses   /   City Directories


  Place your cursor here to read a note about Census records.


Click here for an historical overview / recap of the Federal Census.

Click here for a population graph from 1610 to 2050's estimate.
(When the graph displays, left-click to see a dramatic enlargement.)

Family Groupsby head of household

Census  /  Directory Years

Beck, George Dobson — 10 Apr 1849 > 30 Jul 1930

1930 — Kansas City, Kansas,
with son-in-law, Eugene Moore

1925 — Kansas State Census, Kansas City
with son-in-law, Eugene Moore

1920 — Kansas City, Kansas,
with son-in-law, Eugene Moore

1915 — Kansas State Census, Kansas City

1910 — Kansas City, Kansas,
with son-in-law, Eugene Moore

1905 — Kansas State Census, Kansas City

1900 — Kansas City, Missouri

1890 > 91 — City Directory, Kansas City, Missouri

1880 — Dension, Texas

1870 — Leavenworth, Kansas,
with three brothers,
Thomas Anthony, James, and John



Beck, John R. — 30 Aug 1854 > Oct 1891

1880 — Cooke County, Texas

1870 — Leavenworth, Kansas,
with three brothers,
Thomas Anthony, George Dobson, and James



Faught, Wiley Blount, Sr. — 8 Nov 1799 > 20 Jan 1841
(Wood) Faught, Elizabeth Ann, widow
— 30 Jul 1799 > 12 Jul 1872

1870 — (Elizabeth Ann, a widow)
Obion County, Tennessee

1850 — (Elizabeth Ann, now a widow)
Giles County, Tennessee

1840 — (Wiley and Elizabeth Ann)
Giles County, Tennessee

1830 — (Wiley and Elizabeth Ann)
Giles County, Tennessee



King, Eli B. Alexander — May 1837 > 1876

1870 — Liberty, Madison County, Missouri
with second wife, Mary E. (Miller) King

1860 — Twelve Mile, Madison County, Missouri
with first wife, Missouri E.A. (Reed) King



McNay, David — 1795–1800 > 1831–1839

1830 — Logan County, Ohio



McNay, James — 1761–1770 > before 1840

1830 — Logan County, Ohio

1820 — Logan County, Ohio



McNay, Robert — c.  1830 > 10 Jan 1897

1880 — Valparaiso, Indiana

1870 — Valparaiso, Indiana

1860 — Valparaiso, Indiana

1850 — LaPorte, Indiana

1840 — Elkhart County, Indiana



Mills, Constantine — 6 Sep 1761 > 21 Oct 1848

1820 — Austinburg [Ashtabula] Ohio

1810 — Ashtabula County, Ohio

Ohio's 1810 Census was destroyed
in the War of 1812

1800 — Norfolk, Connecticut

1790 — Litchfield County, Connecticut



Mills, Hadsell Alden — 7 Oct 1870 > 13 Apr 1940

1930 — Bedford Village, Ohio

1928 — City Directory, Cleveland (Bedford Village), Ohio

1920 — Gallatin Twp, Missouri

1910 — Rich Hill Twp, Missouri

1900 — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio,
with father, Henry Martin Mills

1880 — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio,
with father, Henry Martin Mills



Mills, Harvey E. Tuttle — 1808 > after 1880

1860 — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio



Mills, Henry Martin — 11 Mar 1836 > 19 Jul 1908

1900 — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio

1890 — Veterans Schedule;
Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio

1880 — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio



Mills, Simon II — 1637 > 1683

1669 — Connecticut Colonial Census of Freemen
— Windsor, Connecticut Colony



Monteith, Hugh — 8 Jan c. 1772 > after 1860

1830 — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio

1820 — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio

1810 — Salem Twp [Wayne] Pennsylvania



Moore, Eugene W. — 8 Jan c. 1880 > 21 Oct 1957
(Beck) Moore, Anna ("Aunt Annie")
    — 25 Jan 1886 > 12 May 1989

1930 — Kansas City, Kansas,
with father-in-law, George Dobson Beck

1925 — Kansas State Census, Kansas City
with father-in-law, George Dobson Beck

1920 — Kansas City, Kansas,
with father-in-law, George Dobson Beck

1910 — Kansas City, Kansas,
with father-in-law, George Dobson Beck



Reed, James, Sr. — c. 1783 > 13 Oct 1851

1850 — Madison County, Missouri

1840 — Twelvemile Twp [Madison] Missouri

1830 — Twelvemile Twp [Madison] Missouri



Reed, Missouri E.A. — c. 1843 / 44 > ?

1880 — Denison, Texas,
near daughter, Sally (King) Beck

1870 — Ironton, Missouri,
divorced in Sep 1867,
but still using the King name

1860 — Ironton, Missouri,
with first husband, Eli B. Alexander King



Tennis, Adison — 1804 > 14 Jun 1856

1850 — Finley Twp [then Greene County] Missouri

1840 — Sprigg Twp [Adams] Ohio



Tennis, John — 1714 > 24 Jul 1797

1790 — Mifflin County, Pennsylvania



Tennis, John H. — 11 Mar 1833 > 17 Oct 1912

1910 — Denton, Texas,
with son-in-law, Perry Powell

1900 — Denton, Texas
with widower son, William Albert Tennis,
and grandson, John Sherman Tennis

1880 — Denton County, Texas
with son, William Albert Tennis

1850 — Finley Twp (then Greene County) Missouri,
with father, Adison Tennis



Tennis, John Sherman — 24 May 1895 > 1 Dec 1963

1930 — Tarrant County, Texas



Tennis, William — 1750 > bef. 1820

1790 — Montgomery County, Pennsylvania



Wagner, George — 24 Jun 1875 > 5 Jan 1958
1876 immigration with father, Johann Wagner

1947 > 48 — City Directory, Kansas City, Kansas

1945 — City Directory, Kansas City, Kansas

1942 — City Directory, Kansas City, Kansas

1940 — City Directory, Kansas City, Kansas

1938 — City Directory, Kansas City, Kansas

1936 — City Directory, Kansas City, Kansas

1930 — Kansas City, Kansas

1920 — Kansas City, Kansas
with second wife, Lula Belle (Beck) Wagner

1915 — Kansas State Census, Kansas City

1910 — Kansas City, Kansas,
with first wife, Lura May (Williams) Wagner

1905 — Kansas State Census, Kansas City
with first wife, Lura May (Williams) Wagner

1900 — Kansas City, Missouri,
with first wife, Lura May (Williams) Wagner

1897 > 98 — City Directory, Kansas City, Missouri



Wagner, Johann (John) — 1846 > 1920
1876 immigration with family from Russia

1885 — Kansas State Census
— Shannon Twp [Atchison] Kansas

1880* — St. Louis [St. Louis] Missouri
second enumeration, 9 Nov 1880

1880* — Sarcoxie Twp [Jefferson] Kansas
first enumeration, 29 Jun 1880

*Note on 1880:  They moved from Sarcoxie (Kansas) to St. Louis (Missouri) between the enumeration dates in those cities, so ended up being counted in BOTH censuses.

1947 > 1948 — City Directory

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1945 — City Directory

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1942 — City Directory

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1940

1 Apr 2012 is the publication date for our 16th Census.



1940 — City Directory

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1938 — City Directory

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1936 — City Directory

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1930

Beck, George Dobson — Kansas City, Kansas

Mills, Hadsell Alden — Bedford Village, Ohio

Moore, Eugene W. — Kansas City, Kansas

Tennis, John Sherman — Tarrant County, Texas

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1928 — City Directory

Mills, Hadsell Alden — Cleveland (Bedford Village) Ohio



1925 — State Census

Beck, George Dobson
— State Census, Kansas City, Kansas



1920

Beck, George Dobson — Kansas City, Kansas

Mills, Hadsell Alden — Gallatin Twp, Missouri

Moore, Eugene W. — Kansas City, Kansas

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas



1915 — State Census

Beck, George Dobson
— State Census, Kansas City, Kansas

Wagner, George
— State Census, Kansas City, Kansas
with second wife, Lula Belle (Beck) Wagner



1910

Beck, George Dobson — Kansas City, Kansas

Mills, Hadsell Alden — Rich Hill Twp, Missouri

Moore, Eugene W. — Kansas City, Kansas

Tennis, John H. — Denton, Texas,
with son-in-law, Perry Powell

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Kansas
with first wife, Lura May (Williams) Wagner



1905 — State Census

Beck, George Dobson
— State Census, Kansas City, Kansas

Wagner, George
— State Census, Kansas City, Kansas
with first wife, Lura May (Williams) Wagner



1900

Beck, George Dobson — Kansas City, Missouri

Mills, Hadsell Alden — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio,
with father, Henry Martin Mills

Mills, Henry Martin — Morgan Twp [Ashstabula] Ohio

Tennis, John H. — Denton, Texas
with widower son, William Albert Tennis,
and grandson, John Sherman Tennis

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Missouri



1897 > 1898 — City Directory

Wagner, George — Kansas City, Missouri



1890 > 1891 — City Directory

Beck, George Dobson — Kansas City, Missouri



1890 — Census largely destroyed by fire



1890 — Veterans Schedule

Mills, Henry Martin — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula] Ohio



1885 — State Census

Wagner, Johann (John) — Kansas State Census
Shannon Twp [Atchison] Kansas



1880

Beck, George Dobson — Dension, Texas

Beck, John R. — Cooke County, Texas

McNay, Robert — Valparaiso, Indiana

Mills, Hadsell Alden — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula]
Ohio, with father, Henry Martin Mills

Mills, Henry Martin — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula]
Ohio

(Reed) Rankins, Missouri — Denison, Texas

Tennis, John H. — Denton County, Texas

Wagner, Johann (John) — Sarcoxie Twp
[Jefferson] Kansas



1870

Beck, George Dobson — Leavenworth, Kansas,
with three brothers,
Thomas Anthony, James, and John

Faught (Wood), Elizabeth Ann, a widow
— Obion County, Tennessee

King, Eli B. Alexander — Liberty, Madison, Missouri
with second wife, Mary E. (Miller) King

McNay, Robert — Valparaiso, Indiana

(Reed) King, Missouri — Ironton, Missouri
divorced (1867), but still using the King name



1860

King, Eli B. Alexander — Twelve Mile, Madison, Missouri
with first wife, Missouri E.A. (Reed) King

McNay, Robert — Valparaiso, Indiana

Mills, Harvey E. Tuttle — Morgan Twp [Ashtabula]
Ohio



1850

Faught (Wood), Elizabeth Ann, a widow
— Giles County, Tennessee

McNay, Robert — LaPorte, Indiana

Reed, James, Sr. — Madison County, Missouri

Tennis, Adison — Finley Twp, (then Greene County) Missouri

Tennis, John H. — Finley Twp, (then Greene County) Missouri
with father, Adison Tennis



1840

Faught Wiley Blount,. Sr. — Giles County, Tennessee

McNay, Robert — Elkhart County, Indiana

Reed, James, Sr. — Twelvemile [Madison] Missouri

Tennis, Adison — Sprigg Twp [Adams] Ohio



1830

Faught Wiley Blount,. Sr. — Giles County, Tennessee

McNay, David  — Logan County, Ohio

McNay, James  — Logan County, Ohio

Monteith, Hugh  — Morgan Twp, Ohio

Reed, James, Sr. — Twelvemile [Madison] Missouri



1820

McNay, James  — Logan County, Ohio

Mills, Constantine  — Austinburg, Ohio

Monteith, Hugh  — Morgan Twp, Ohio



1810much of the 1810 Census was destroyed
in the War of 1812

Monteith, Hugh  — Salem Twp, Pennsylvania



1800much of the 1800 Census was destroyed
in the War of 1812

Mills, Constantine — Norfolk [Litchfield] Connecticut



1790

Mills, Constantine — Litchfield County, Connecticut

Tennis, John — Mifflin County, Pennsylvania

Tennis, William — Montgomery County, Pennsylvania



1669 — Connecticut Colonial Census of Freemen

Mills, Simon II — Windsor, Connecticut Colony

Federal Census Overview  /  Procedural Highlights

For the Census Bureau's own complete and more detailed decennial recaps, click here.
1787 The Constitution (Article 1, Section 2) requires that every ten years an "actual enumeration" or census of all "persons" within the United States be conducted, in order to
(1) apportion members of the House of Representatives among the several states

—(starting with 65 in 1787, adding seats as the nation grew,
until 1911, when 435 was fixed as the maximum size.
)—

and
(2) levy direct per-capita taxes

—(but there have been no such federal levies for well over 200 years,
so that reason for census-taking is now moot
).



The National Archives keeps sealed, for a full 72 years, all personal or individual information gathered in each Census.  Thus, the 1950 Census will be "opened" in 2022. But averages or aggregate data are immediately published, to report on elements such as economic or racial patterns within districts, or other demographic trends.

Enumerations before 1850 are of marginal value in genealogy.
True, they can locate family lines in various places, but rarely can reveal relationships.
• For example, a John Wagner may be listed near a Thomas Wagner, but living in the same town or county does NOT establish them as brothers, or as a father / son, or as an uncle / nephew
— or indeed, whether they are even related at all.

NOTE:  Until the 13th Amendment was ratified in 1865, a slave was counted as only 3/5ths of a person.  That embarrassing provision was a compromise reached by the Founders; otherwise, the slave-holding South might have refused to join the new Union.  And if sections of the country went their separate ways, far more powerful European states —(including dreaded England!)— might well return them to colonial status.

• To increase their voting power in the House of Representatives, Southerners wanted ALL slaves counted.
• To prevent such a stranglehold on the House, the North wanted NO slaves counted.
Thus, the "three-fifths deal" struck an uneasy (not to mention unholy) balance:  it gave the slave states a few more representatives, but not as many as if all their slaves had been counted.
1790
1st
The first census asks simple, general questions:

    • The name of each head of household, male or female, and the number of people living there:
    • free white males age 16 or older;
    • free white males under age 16 (= 15 or younger);
    • free white females;
    • other free persons of whatever race, age, or gender; and
    • slaves.

Male ages were important, not only for voting, but for a military draft, should one be needed.
Large chunks of our first Census documents are now lost.
1800
2nd
>
1840
6th
Additional age ranges are included, and females are now enumerated by age — but, alas, only family heads are named.


Unfortunately, almost all 1800 and 1810 documents have been lost, or were destroyed in the War of 1812 when the British burned government buildings in Washington, D.C.
1850
7th
The range of questions is greatly enhanced, to include names of all residents in a household, a specific age for each, gender, occupation, place of birth, real property value, whether able to read /  write, and if any serious impairments exist.  Note that being a "pauper" or a convict is equated with being "deaf and dumb," blind, insane, or "idiotic."
1865 The 13th Amendment, by abolishing slavery in 1865, mooted the "three-fifths of a person" counting rule which had applied to slaves.  The Southern states, although they lost the Civil War they started, actually gained House seats in subsequent Census-based reapportionments.
1890
11th
First use of punch-cards to tabulate certain findings.  About 75% of the 1890 records were burned or damaged in a 1921 fire, and what remained was sadly, disposed of.  See the entry for 1921.
1902 Congress authorizes a permanent Census Office, which is transferred the following year to the Department of Commerce and Labor.  (In 1913, when Commerce and Labor are divided into separate departments, the Census Bureau stays with the Department of Commerce.)  No archiving provisions are included.
1920
14th
For the first and only time, no reapportionment of the House of Representatives occurs following this Census.  By the end of World War I, there had been a clear population shift from farms to cities — the United States is now more urban than rural.  For nine years, members from rural, largely conservative districts repeatedly derail reapportionment in order to preserve their own seats and prevent more liberal urban populations from taking control of the House.  (Specifically, there is fear that Prohibition might be repealed if non-farm voters gain full representation.)  Finally, in 1929 a permanent, automatic reapportionment law is enacted to prevent such an abuse of power in the future.
1921 The 1890 Census is severely damaged by a fire in the Commerce Department's basement storage area.  Although a number of other Census records suffer at least some water damage, 25% of 1890's returns are burned and another 50% significantly damaged.  A decade passes with no attempt to restore or recopy the remaining records, which are rapidly deteriorating even further.  By 1932, the Librarian of Congress suggests they be destroyed.  Congress unwisely follows that recommendation, and what is left of the 1890 Census is incinerated during 1934 / 1935.  A few scattered remnants have surfaced since then, but these contain only 6,000 of the 62 million names originally listed.
1940
16th
Statistical sampling is introduced, which allows the Census Bureau to create a "long form" for a subset of the population, while others answer fewer questions on a "short form."
1950
17th
For the first time an electronic computer, UNIVAC I, is used to help tabulate results.
1960
18th
In an effort to move toward voluntary self-counting, census forms are mailed to urban households to be completed and sent back to the Census Bureau.
1970
19th
Mail-in forms take precedence over door-to-door census-takers.  For the first time, respondents are asked to check off whether they are of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent.
1980
20th
Although the 1980 census is considered one of the most accurate in recent decades, the City of New York and various civil rights groups challenge the final results, based on reports of widespread under-counting among urban minorities.
1990
21st
Census 1990 costs $2.6 billion.  It appears to be the first to be less accurate than the one preceding it — an estimated 8.4 million people are missed, while another 4.4 million are counted twice.  These problems are partly blamed on declining census participation:  the voluntary response rate for Census 1990 drops to only 65%.
1999 The Supreme Court narrowly holds, 5 to 4, that statistical sampling cannot be used to apportion congressional districts among the states, although sampling can be used for certain other purposes — for example, to assess ethnicity or age-group / income distributions in various parts of the country.  The Court's myopic ruling, based on a strict construction of the Constitution's phrase "actual enumeration," guarantees that future Censuses will be laborious, time-consuming, expensive — and flawed.  It is simply no longer possible to "actually count" more than a third of a billion people. 
2000
22nd
As expected from the preceding year's Supreme Court decision, Census 2000 costs more than double, to $6 billion.  This becomes the largest peacetime mobilization of resources and personnel in history.  For the first time, the Bureau mounts a nationwide advertising campaign to encourage people to fill out their forms, but under- and double-counting problems continue anyway.

2010
23rd
Despite shortening the number of questions to only 10, costs soar to $15 billion, setting yet another record.  Participation is hampered by a growing suspicion that personal data will be used for purposes other than merely apportioning congressional seats among the states.  It is widely agreed that this Census is seriously flawed.

Home      Census Images      Charts       Documents    Immigration Portraits Maps / Places Personal Gallery